When lawyers, we strive to determine the quality of our claims based on factual facts, but not on the network of assistance the elucidates the evidence. Despite tv shows that show an advocate as the primary determinant of a trial, we know better than anybody else that, when a lawsuit hits court, multiple persons employed in various capacities will make or destroy its reputation, one of them being a court reporter. As all lawyers realize, in the end, the success of certain lawsuits is decided by the quality of depositions. But while attorneys scrupulously examine depositions, they seldom examine reporters’ qualifications for deposition. In most cases, the lawyers are too busy to examine a reporter in court as if they were examining a witness. But there is a way for lawyers to select the best reporters without having to investigate them: to contact a reputable court reporting agency. Below, we list three aspects of the screening process for reporters that define a reputable reporting agency. Feel free to find more information at Fort Lauderdale Court Reporting
Certified court reporting is based on having the job proper certifications. However, anyone who has had a bad experience with a certified reporter can attest that the value of a reporter depends on more than its certifications. One way to determine the value of a reporter beyond certifications is by screening references rigorously, particularly those not listed. A reporter’s listed references will be screened by every certified court reporting agency. But the strongest companies often call for several sources not mentioned in a reporter’s resume. By reviewing a broad variety of sources, a news organization may assess that only a few commendable investigative tasks have been carried out by a writer or have a genuine reputation for excellence.
Technical Ability Screening
As with most professions, court reporting is increasingly being characterized by technological methods , particularly real-time reporting and video reporting. If you want these abilities in a writer, you won’t consider reporters that hold them hard to identify. But you may have difficulty discerning how skilled a reporter is in your specific reporting needs. Just as some lawyers take on cases they don’t specialize in, some reporters take on assignments that they aren’t skilled in reporting. To avoid these reporters, always hire through a reporting agency that is actually testing the abilities of their reporters rather than judging their abilities by their certifications.
It may seem odd if court reporters are to be screened dependent on personalities. After all, trial reporters are usually quiet throughout their duties, and sedentary. But the temperament of court reporters has much to do with how they view themselves at depositions; it also has to do with how they respond to deponents in terms of the text of deposition. A reporter who is easily bored, prejudiced or angrily reacts to certain topics could produce a transcript which is untrue or highly flawed in terms of the nonverbal reactions of the deponent. Again, some agencies that report court rely on credentials from a reporter. But a reporting agency which respects its customers profoundly can screen its reporters based on personality.